New York Real Estate Lawyer Blog

In a transparent effort to raise fees, the New York State Legislature has instituted a fee hike on real property transfers, by increasing the filing fees for the RP-5217 Property Transfer Report. [See Real Property Law § 333(3), amended by L.2009, c.56, Pt. JJ, approved 4/7/2009].

The new fees increased most deed filing fees from $165 to $250, (for deeds submitted for recording after June 1, 2009). For questions on the new filing fee or other transfer report related matters, contact the Rockland County Clerk’s Office or the ORPS’ Data Management Unit at 518-473-7222.

Bottom Line, they have to make up the budget shortfalls somewhere.

There are various standard inspections that buyers of New York State real estate customarily order in their inspection process to buying a home. According to the pest control experts, there should be another– an inspection for Climex Lectularius or “common bed bug.”

Everyone’s worst nightmare is a hotel room infected with those tiny nocturnal insects that hide in nooks, crannies, and crevices during the day, but feed on humans (blood) at night. The nightmare scenario of oval flattent and wingless bodies which are a light to reddish-brown and 1/4 to 3/8 inch long (think apple seed). The welts take a day or two to develop and not all bed bug sufferers react to their bites, which delays detection and action.

Buyer beware if you’re buying a house or looking for a new condo or apartment because you may be moving into a home or apartment invaded by bed bugs. New York State law provides you no protection from such pest infestations because most sellers do not complete the Property Disclosure Statements choosing instead to pay a $500 penalty for not completing it before making the sale. Indeed, real estate disclosure laws often don’t apply to co-op and condo owners or lessors.

As the distress in the real estate market continues in New York, more and more people are turning to their lawyers to carefully review and consider their real estate sales contracts for any “loop holes” available to justify the cancellation of a contract and to win the return of a down payment.

The scenario in a New York City Condo purchase goes something like this. The buyer puts down a boat load of money as a down payment to secure an apartment in the hottest building in Manhattan, or any of the five boroughs. The developer starts having financial difficulties or can’t meet originally intended construction deadlines, and, in the intervening months (or years), the buyer loses interest or a job and can no longer afford the price (which has also declined). As the New York real estate market crumbles, so do these deals, and the buyer wants out.

Recently, some bright and creative New York Real Estate litigators have turned to an ancient, but potentially useful, statute passed in 1968 and known as the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, to argue that the down payments should be returned and the contracts voided because the Developer did not comply with the provisions. The Interstate Land Sales Disclosure Act generally applies to developers selling or leasing–through interstate commerce.

In this era of distressed real estate, and even more distressed home owners, there are several life rings being thrown around including “sale-lease back” options. Under a typical “sale and lease back” situation an “investor” buys a person’s home and leases it back to them. The practice is both common and legal in real estate, and is intended to raise cash for short-term needs or to secure tax benefits. Sometimes, the leaseback agreements permit the sellers the right to repurchase the property after some prescribed period and that is often a benefit to the investor in an inclining real estate market.

In residential real estate, the sale-leaseback allows financially strapped homeowners in financial trouble to stay in their homes and pay their debts, but the practice is susceptible to fraud when investors don’t give homeowners the promised money. For example, some “investors” pocket the mortgages they obtain from banks or strip equity from the homes rather than letting owners get back on their feet.

The WSJournal had an interesting article which explained the potential pitfalls of such a relationship.

Did you know that New York State has in the past, and continues to, sell, give, and transfer portions of navigable waters to interested upland owners. What does that mean?

Ever wonder who owns the lands under the Hudson River? In river communities where water front property is valuable for its view, the land can also be valuable for land you cannot see– the land under water.

“Land under water”‘ is land submerged by water, and includes that land below the high water mark in navicable waters (rivers), tidal water (estuaries), lakes and ponds, and, at times, can appear to be dry land (perhaps it was previously filled naturally by development). The owner of property on “dry land” is referred to as the “Upland Owner,” and is often benefited by actually owning the rights to the land under water. Generally speaking, New York State owns the land under all navigable lakes, streams, and rivers.